What desktop research can tell you, and who answers the rest

Why we draw this line in public

A research service that overstates what it knows costs its clients money. The most useful thing we can tell a buyer is exactly where our knowledge ends and a licensed professional’s begins. Every site summary we write ends with that handoff.

Electrical and interconnection

Research shows: mapped transmission and substations, published voltage, utility territory, distance from the parcel boundary, and obstacles along a connection path.

The utility and an electrical engineer answer: available capacity, the point of delivery, required upgrades, cost responsibility, redundancy, and the date power can flow.

Civil and site development

Research shows: parcel shape, mapped flood and wetlands, slope, the connected usable remainder, road frontage, and mapped utilities.

A civil engineer answers: grading, stormwater design, the site layout, utility extensions, and what local development rules require.

Geotechnical

Research shows: survey-level soil types and their general concerns: drainage, shrink-swell clay, shallow rock, high water table.

A geotechnical engineer answers: bearing capacity, depth to rock, groundwater at the foundation, and what the ground will cost to prepare. This takes borings.

Water and wastewater

Research shows: candidate providers, system-wide reported supply and treatment, and permitted facilities nearby.

The providers and a water engineer answer: whether the system will serve this project, at what volume, through what extension, at what cost.

Mechanical and cooling

Research shows: local climate records and water context, which shape which cooling designs are practical.

A mechanical engineer answers: the cooling design, its water and energy use, and whether the site supports it.

Telecommunications

Research shows: providers on record and nearby interconnection points.

Carriers and a network engineer answer: actual routes, physical separation, available capacity, lateral cost, and delivery dates.

Environmental

Research shows: recorded facilities, incidents, and conservation interests on and near the tract.

An environmental professional answers: whether contamination exists, through a Phase 1 assessment and any testing that follows; wetlands, through a delineation; and protected species, through field surveys.

Survey and title

Research shows: the county’s mapped boundary, recorded acreage, the owner of record, and recorded plats and easements.

A surveyor and a title attorney answer: the legal boundary, the true acreage, who can sell, and every burden on the title.

Land use

Research shows: the regulating government, the zoning district, the ordinance text, overlays, and any local pause.

Planning staff and a land-use attorney answer: how the rules apply to this project and what the approval path really is.

Fire protection and acoustics

Research shows: fire station locations, water-system context, and the distance to homes.

A fire-protection engineer and an acoustical engineer answer: fire-flow adequacy and the sound a design will produce at the property line.

What this means in practice

Desktop research is fast and inexpensive, and professional work is neither. Used in the right order, research removes the sites that would have failed anyway and tells each professional where to start. That is its whole value. It is not a way to skip the professionals.

Questions

Can site research replace a feasibility study?

No. It comes before one. It decides which sites merit a feasibility study and frames the questions.

What should I do first on a site I already own?

Confirm the parcel and the regulating government, then read the record for power, local rules, and usable acreage. Those three decide whether the rest is worth paying for.